– Missouri Supreme Court Judge Robin Ransom raises a flag on unexcused absences
– Five Justices in concurrence
– Unexcused absences violate state law
– Potential implications for the case
Robin Ransom Raises the Bar
Upon the heavy oak table of the Missouri Supreme Court, something far from ordinary was noted. Judge Robin Ransom, a discerning enforcer of justice, was quick to raise a flag on an aspect often overlooked – unexcused absences. Indeed, in the court of law, presence is indispensable, no less mighty than the gavel itself.
A Majority Convergence
Her findings were not tossed into the abyss of disagreement, far from it. Five other Justices, trained arbiters of the law, found themselves nodding in concurrence. It was not a matter of subjectivity, but of clear lines drawn by the law.
A Breach of State Law
A seemingly trivial fact of missing court dates was viewed in a higher light. Unexcused absences, as per Ransom’s argument, violated state law. And in a realm that fondly cherishes order and punctuality, this could potentially plot a rough course for the case.
The Breezy Take
In the hullabaloo of legal proceedings, the importance of being physically present in court cannot be overstated. Judge Robin Ransom’s astute finding, with a majority concurrence, only drives the point home that unexcused absences are not merely a question of propriety, but veer into the domain of legal violation. The lingering shadow this could cast on the case is something to watch out for, indeed, a miss need not always birth a mile, especially in the complex equations of law. If anything, it could be miles of legal instability; even a nod and a wink are weighty matters in a courtroom.
Original article: https://stlpr.org/education/2023-08-15/parents-can-face-jail-time-over-unexcused-school-absences-missouri-supreme-court-rules